Reductio ad Absurdum

Reductio ad absurdum is a kind of argument with which one argues for one’s own position by revealing the absurdity of an opponent’s position–one tries to reduce the opponent’s position to absurdity.  For more information on reductio ad absurdum, click here.

William Blake makes excellent use of this argumentative structure in at least two pieces of writing:

There Is No Natural Religion

In the first half (section a) of this early prose work, Blake employs a reductio ad absurdum strategy to show the kinds of absurdities which result from the belief that all of a person’s mental life is the product of sensory experience (a view Blake did NOT hold).  In the second half of this work (section b), Blake makes his positive case: because our imaginations are filled with dreams and ambitions which seem more than just copies of what we perceive, we all must have some other infinite, creative potential in us.

“A Poison Tree”

In this poem–a kind of productio ad absurdum–Blake reveals the kind of troubles that can result from repressed anger.

“The Chaff,” by W. S. Merwin (in The Carrier of Ladders, collected in The Second Four Books, p. 219).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: